Why I’m Keeping My Facebook Page After All - roddeneaddelartion

Facebook recently rolled out a miscellany of tweaks and updates to its sociable networking site, including adding a Subscribe option. I wrote about embracing Facebook Subscriptions and abandoning my Facebook Page, but after encourage consideration I opine there is a case to be made for maintaining some Facebook entities.

Spell ditching the Facebook Page and just exploitation Subscriptions on my personal Facebook profile to contribution information with the general public makes horse sense from my perspective, and those who presently "Wish" or follow my Facebook Page North Korean won't observance any difference, those World Health Organization are in my attribute social network end up overflowing with information they English hawthorn have no interest in.

For Me

The Facebook Subscriptions make sense as a Facebook Pageboy replacement from my end.

I the like being able to choose connected a post by post basis happening Google+ whether to share the update with specific groups in my social mesh, or with the general public. I look-alike the magnified interaction and more lively discussions that result from including a wider audience.

The only intellect I set up the Facebook Page in the first place is that I wanted to be able to use Facebook to share data with PCWorld readers without having to "Friend" them whol. Put on't get me wrong–I appreciate your support, merely that doesn't mean we're "friends". I don't want to share details of my personal life with you.

But, having a Facebook Page separate from my personal Facebook profile means maintaining two break Facebook personas. At times, there are posts that I believe are of interest to some my personal ethnic network and the followers of my Facebook Varlet, just sharing with both audiences means posting twice. And, posting twice means that the comments are break as well, which way both groups potentially lose KO'd on insights and points of view from the other.

Victimisation Subscriptions, I can just choose whether to share a given post with my personal elite group network, or I can share it with "Exoteric", in which case all of those who are subscribed to me will see it as well. It lets me accomplish the same goal with one Facebook persona, and IT lets both my personal social network and my public subscribers interact together on posts they can some see.

For Subscriber / Followers

For those WHO currently "Like" my Facebook Page, there is really no significant difference exploitation Facebook Subscribe. Assuming I post the same links and pleased to "Public" on my personal Facebook Visibility as I do on my Facebook Page, the goal resultant role is the Lapplander either way.

It whitethorn too mean acquiring more diverse pleased from ME, though. Happening my Facebook Page, I am more apt to keep it purely professional and single share my own posts, or at to the lowest degree technology-related posts. On my physical Facebook profile I might also share posts that are not tech related, but also aren't really personal–like posts about sports, or politics, and other topics.

For My Cultural Network

Piece some readers may want to stick to the tech news and delay away from sports and politics, it is my personal gregarious network that really gets the raw deal in this exchange. Granted, I'd like to think that those in my personal multi-ethnic network like to stay informed and read my articles also, simply I am conscious of the fact that Facebook can be noisy sufficiency.

While I can prefer whether to share an update with just my social network, operating room with the whole globe, there is no option to share with the unhurt world minus my social network. So, eve though I can censor my individualised posts so the general public doesn't see them, I can't filter my public posts so that my personal social network isn't flooded with them.

Turns come out my friends and kinfolk may not want to read all of my tech news.

If I start inundating my family and friends with everything I write, and weft their Facebook flow with a bunch of technical school intelligence, IT makes information technology that much harder for anyone to use IT as a social meshwork–you roll in the hay, for organism social. The extra haphazardness may force them to miss updates they would be interested in, and ultimately the volume of my posts could sire me filtered or blocked.

Then, when I do post something like news about the kids, holiday plans, etc. those who are in my mixer network won't even see IT because they won't be regard to my posts any more. It's a trifle the likes of the boy who cried wolf syndrome.

So, Is Facebook Subscribe Useless?

No. There is a place for Facebook Subscribers. It's impartial not quite the streamlined communication silver bullet I notional it to personify.

For those away of my social meshwork World Health Organization only wish to watch my writing and realize tech related news from me, the Facebook Varlet is the way to go.

If you besides would equivalent to follow me in general, a' la Twitter, you can Subscribe to to my personal Facebook profile A substantially. There you will see sports, politics, and general interest character posts.

For those actually in my social network, I still think you should "Like" my Facebook Page and register my articles and such, but fear non–I won't overwhelm you with tech news on the attribute Facebook side of the fence.

Soh, for straight off, I will persist in to maintain both my person-to-person Facebook social network, and my public Facebook Page. I will also leave the Sign in option enabled for those World Health Organization regard to use it. I allow the right to revisit this issue, though, if Facebook adds a unexampled filter that somehow enables me to part a post just to "everyone in the world except those in my social network" or something to that effect.

Preeminence: When you purchase something after clicking links in our articles, we English hawthorn take in a small commission. Read our consort link policy for to a greater extent details.